Now that The Khanka Colloquy has become an open secret, I think that it is time that we open a discussion of the...
Now that The Khanka Colloquy has become an open secret, I think that it is time that we open a discussion of the definition of and the identification of Sensitives. I do not know how, or even if, the term was officially defined for the purposes of the Niantic Project, though it was bandied about as far back as Waratah, but there seems to be a consensus that some people are highly successful to the effects of XM, to the point that it heightens not only their innate abilities, but ability to feel the presence of Exotic Matter and, perhaps, Chaotic Matter, which is still only detected, I believe, by its reaction upon encountering Exotic Matter -- hence why it is not visible on Scanners.
The question to each of you is, do you believe yourself to be a Sensitive? If so, why?
The question to each of you is, do you believe yourself to be a Sensitive? If so, why?
I can't say that I've any reason to believe my sensory experience is significantly different from human baseline, but the nature of XM inspiration as reported by case studies (especially Antonin Hollis' work with Roland Jarvis and John Doe) makes it difficult for one to discern. Like tetrachromats or supertasters, it's possible that one could go through their entire life assuming their broadened experience of the world is the same as everyone else's. It surprises me to hear that after Warratah, Wydah, Niantic, and the recent work by V, H, and I there is no common protocol for assessing XM sensitivity. Calvin seemed to be able to reliably recruit sensitivies for Niantic, but it's possible they were simply far enough out on the spectrum as to have been the most obvious candidates.
ReplyDeleteAs for the Khanka Colloquy, that secret may be less open than you think - at least among the XM community at large.
What is the Khanka Colloquy? Edgar Allan Wright
ReplyDeleteI believe that i am a sensitive although the term is relative. I seem to be able to make accurate predictions as well as be attuned to other worldly beings.
ReplyDeleteTaking note of The Khanka Colloquy. The concept of being a sensitive is an interesting one, and for the purposes of many of these projects, has always been a label given to people, virtually never self-proclaimed.
ReplyDeleteAs a recognized Seer at least someone feels I have some talent for finding power spots, even if some are hokey.
ReplyDeleteTo Dr. Edgar Allan Wright:
ReplyDeleteI believe that, to a degree, I am a sensitive. I primarily believe that due to the work I did in attempting to help you with your memory via Shaper Glyphs, I subjected myself to that particular sequence in question to ensure that the presentation would work properly.
I am now convinced that I have been affected by that sequence and that it has...for lack of a better word, overclocked my memory, allowing me access to a more heightened state of recollection. This only occurs in regards to any inquiries about the Niantic Project or the Investigation-outside of that, my memory is unchanged.
That sequence can be seen in translation here: https://plus.google.com/+MustafaSaid/posts/NJx7X2qU5Qw
There have been places and experiences linked to those places that somehow seemed to go against the expected norms, and those places turned out to be portals. In that sense I assume most of us here are sensitives.
ReplyDeleteI can detect portals and their levels without a scanner, and frequently do with new or visiting agents on local upc tours. Don't scan and drive!
ReplyDeleteAlso chaotic matter scanners = 3rd faction confirmed!
I just ran a blood test and it registered a saturated amount of midichlorians
ReplyDeleteI don't believe I am a sensitive, but I can definitely sense XM. During anomalies, it's like you can feel the presence of everyone gathering to fight. It feels like a weight in my mind. I get the same feeling when going back to anomaly sites. Visiting the Christopher Columbus statue in Chicago, I had that same feeling of weight. I can see flashes of agents gathering for Operation Cassandra. It's almost like the same feeling one would get visiting an old battlefield. You can feel the presence of the soldiers, and can sometimes see them, but you know they aren't there. Almost like a time compression.
ReplyDeleteI've come back several times to the idea that maybe we are all sensitives since you first asked us if we thought we were in the Operation Essex hangout, Dr. Wright. Do we all hear the birds chirping around us? Do we all feel the wind on our faces? The chirps, the wind, they fall upon us all but only a few truly experience them. Not because they have extra senses that others don't, but because, by some effort of learning, something they experienced, or something that they figured out on their own unintentionally, they are listening for it and feeling for it. They hear the birds chirping, and they feel the wind on their faces while the rest of humanity moves about their lives, ignorant of the details around them. The scanner helps make us aware of some of those details around us and prompts us to dig further and experience more.
ReplyDeleteThere is a difference between serendipity and being a sensitive. I fear admitting to the latter may not be wise. It has not seemed to work out well for members of the Niantic Project. Perhaps it wise to keep such information private.
ReplyDeleteI can't describe myself as a sensitive but as someone which understands and is receptive to the concept. Those 100% given to sensitiveness are more exposed to public and private scrutiny because they are different and become person's of interest. As well people is more attracted to them which makes them suffer more and on different ways. History can explain my point better and greater.
ReplyDelete.
ReplyDeleteWe each carry our own little circle of weirdness with us, but what of that makes us "sensitive"? Is it something about us that makes us different in that we can perceive where others cannot, or is it that we are aware of our perception where others are not. The soul-shaking sensation triggered by a place, a song, an event... the ghost seen yet unseen... the knowledge that "something is here"... Do these things make us sensitive, or are we just unable to inform them as others do?
ReplyDeleteIndeed evil witch.
ReplyDeleteCan a sensitive die and come back?
ReplyDeleteNot sure this qualifies as being a sensitive, but I'm uncannily intuitive, weather it intuition or premonition I'll leave that for the shapers to decide.
ReplyDelete